The pandemic and the robots we suddenly need

Something is happening in Wuhan.

I’ve been following it for two weeks, and the reports keep escalating. A novel coronavirus. Hospitals overwhelmed. A city of 11 million people on lockdown. The images coming out are surreal. Empty streets. People in hazmat suits. Drones flying over neighborhoods telling people to go home.

The drones are what caught my attention.

Not because drones are new. They’re not. But because the first instinct, when a disease makes human contact dangerous, is to reach for machines. It’s such an immediate, practical response that it almost doesn’t register as significant.

But I think it is.

The debate we were having

For the last five years, the conversation about automation has been about jobs. Will robots take our jobs? Should we let them? Is it ethical to automate when people need work? The whole thing had this luxury quality to it, like we were debating which color to paint the future.

A virus just repainted it for us.

Suddenly the question isn’t “should we automate?” The question is “can we automate fast enough?”

Boston Dynamics is deploying Spot robots for remote triage, measuring vital signs without nurses being in the room. Nuro is running contactless delivery vehicles in test cities. Starship Technologies has little sidewalk robots carrying food and packages. Hospitals in China are using UV disinfection robots to clean rooms.

None of this is experimental anymore. It’s not a demo. It’s not a conference talk. A virus is spreading and the answer, over and over, is: send the machine instead.

The things we built “just in case”

What’s striking is that most of this technology already existed. Spot wasn’t built for pandemics. Nuro wasn’t designed for plague logistics. These were robots looking for a use case, and the use case just walked through the door carrying a bat-borne respiratory virus.

I keep thinking about the warehouse robots. Amazon has more than 200,000 of them in its fulfillment centers. Before January, the story was about how they displaced warehouse workers. Now the story is about how they can keep operating when human workers can’t come in. Same robots. Same technology. Completely different framing.

That shift happened in about two weeks.

What worries me

Here’s what I’m sitting with tonight.

When this pandemic ends (and it will end), the robots won’t go back in the box. The contactless delivery infrastructure, the automated testing systems, the cleaning robots, the drones. All of it will stay. And it should stay. These are genuinely useful machines doing genuinely useful things.

But the conversation about automation will have fundamentally changed. It won’t be “should we?” It’ll be “we already did.” The pandemic will have fast-tracked a decade of adoption into a year.

And the people whose jobs those robots eventually replace? The ones the five-year debate was about? They’ll still need answers. The urgency of the crisis will have made the question louder, not quieter.

I don’t have a solution. I just think we should pay attention to this moment. The point where “robots are coming” shifted to “robots are here, thank god.”

That shift happened faster than I thought it would. I’m not sure we’re ready for what comes after.

The WHO keeps updating the case count. I keep refreshing the page. The numbers keep climbing.

The robots keep working.

Related thinking: